Sleeping dogs high res texture pack comparison

#SLEEPING DOGS HIGH RES TEXTURE PACK COMPARISON FULL#

If you watch, card makers will economize meticulously.

Did you know you can largely determine the class of video card cooler via a simple visual inspection? True story: IРІР‚в„ўve been told each heatpipe on these things adds 50 cents to the manufacturing cost. Since weРІР‚в„ўre spilling secrets, hereРІР‚в„ўs something IРІР‚в„ўve learned over too many years of doing this job. Been using the same one for years, and itРІР‚в„ўs all over the Internet, since our pictures are regularly, uh, РІР‚СљborrowedРІР‚Сњ by content farms and such. I probably shouldnРІР‚в„ўt tell you this, but since IРІР‚в„ўve decided not to do a proper write-up, IРІР‚в„ўll let you in on a little secret: that quarter is frickinРІР‚в„ў famous. The GK104 (left) versus the GK106 (right) Seriously, with this kind of parity, how am I supposed to conjure up drama for these reviews? (Note to self: consider adding L2 cache sizes to table in future.) YouРІР‚в„ўve probably noticed that the GK106 is just two square millimeters larger than the Pitcairn chip that powers the Radeon HD 7800 series. The only thing missing is the L2 cache amount, which is 384KB. Beyond that, look, the specs are in the table, people. With its five SMX cores, the GK106 has a total of 960 shader ALUs (calling those ALUs РІР‚СљCUDA coresРІР‚Сњ is crazy marketing talk, like saying a V8 engine has РІР‚Сљeight motorsРІР‚Сњ). IРІР‚в„ўve talked to Charlie Demerjian, people. Really, a missing SMX? I know better than to trust Nvidia.

#SLEEPING DOGS HIGH RES TEXTURE PACK COMPARISON FULL#

Is that really the GK106РІР‚в„ўs full complement of units? Nvidia claims, and I quote, that the GTX 660 РІР‚Сљuses the full chip implementation of GK106 silicon.РІР‚Сњ But I remain skeptical. The unit counts in that diagram are correct for the GTX 660, right down to that third GPC, or graphics processing cluster, with only a single SMX engine inside of it. This is a smaller, cut-down chip with fewer resources throughout, as depicted in the block diagram above. ThatРІР‚в„ўs right: the GTX 660 is based on the GK106 chip, not the GK104 part that weРІР‚в„ўve been talking about for months.Р”Р‡unctional block diagram of the GK106 chip. TheyРІР‚в„ўre calling this thing РІР‚СљGeForce GTX 660,РІР‚Сњ but itРІР‚в„ўs not based on the same chip as its purported sibling, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti. You know whatРІР‚в„ўs rich? This apparently pedestrian branding exercise actually involves new GPU silicon. I could tell you about its high-end features-such as support for up to four displays across three different input types, PCI Express 3.0 transfer rates, or two-way SLI multi-GPU teaming-but youРІР‚в„ўll probably forget about them two paragraphs from now. Who needs to know about that when youРІР‚в„ўre Calling your Duties or prancing around in your fancy hats in TF2? All youРІР‚в„ўre likely to worry about are pedestrian concerns, like the fact that this card needs only 140W of power, so it requires just one six-pin power input. Heck, you probably donРІР‚в„ўt even care that the card has a mixed-density memory config with three 64-bit interfaces driving 2GB of GDDR5 memory. This value proposition doesnРІР‚в„ўt involve difficult math.

The ROP rate and memory bandwidth havenРІР‚в„ўt even changed, and yet the price is down 70 bucks. And yes, that really is a drop from 14 Xboxes worth of filtering power to 10. Versus the GTX 660 Ti, this ever-so РІР‚СљnewРІР‚Сњ product is a tad slower in texture filtering, rasterization, and shader flops rates. Look, itРІР‚в„ўs as simple as a few key variables. And if you have half a working lobe in your skull, you know whatРІР‚в„ўs coming next: the price is lower, along with the performance. You can see from the picture that itРІР‚в„ўs based on the same reference design as the GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GTX 670. IРІР‚в„ўm totally not going to tell you about the video card shown above, the GeForce GTX 660. This second-rate website can get a new spokesmonkey. I should be, I dunno, explaining write coalescing in the Xeon Phi or editing a multicast IP routing table somewhere, not helping you lot decide between a video card with 10 Xbox 360s worth of rendering power and another with 14. I am nobodyРІР‚в„ўs fool, and IРІР‚в„ўm not going to keep playing this same record over and over again, like Joe Biden at the DNC. Heck, I can see your lips moving while I talk. By now, the script is getting to be pretty stale. You probably expect me to say something about how the competition from AMD is pretty decent, too, although the RadeonРІР‚в„ўs power draw is higher. By now, you know how it ends: with me explaining that this new graphics card delivers enough performance for most people and questioning why anyone would spend more. You know the one, where Nvidia has taken its potent Kepler GPU architecture, shaved off a few bits, and raised the performance ceiling for a lower price range. Every few weeks, it seems like, weРІР‚в„ўre back in this same place, and IРІР‚в„ўm telling the same story again.

You know, we really canРІР‚в„ўt keep meeting like this.

Sleeping dogs high res texture pack comparison